14
15.
234
cargo
respecting
the identity and name of the accused. I believe he
brought down
also as a witness against Chang Chi. The case of Kwong Tiong is on the whole, I
submit, in favor of the accused.
The release of Cheung Yat was applied for by the Officer of Customs.
Despatch dated 8th February (34) which was written on the representation of Capt. Charles who
says
that he has discovered distinct evidence that
Chang Yoh with one of the piratical crafts was in Hongkong and the Viceroy states that he has traced by the help of informers to Hongkong. Whilst Chang Ych in his evidence in the
first case said he was arrested
because he refused to give evidence against Chang Chi. This, of course, is denied by U Sui Han.
Inspector Matheson
says
that he knows the junk; it looks like a junk, has traces of having carried salt, and as to the accused being traced by informers,
we have
it in evidence that he came daily to the
charge room; after Chang Chi had
been arrested, went into the Gaol.
The Viceroy
also mentions Chang
Sai Fang, You Pang Hang, Cheang Chang
Fun, A-man, Izai Tren, and Shaikan, as being the other pirates
and being in hiding in Hongkong. The
defence
I believe, are on board the salt junk and who the
wanted to call as witnesses
in the first case, but they got frightened
As soon as
Chang Chi
was arrested;
and it is to them that Mr. Mackean
alludes
14
15.
234
cargo
respecting
the idecitity and name of the accused. I believe he
COCO
brought down
also as a wittues against Chang Chi . The of Kwong tion is on the whok, I
evideuce
the accused.
submit, in favor of the
The reuetition of Cheung yat was applied
Euston in a
for by the Oinrey of Custon.
Despatch dated 8th February (34 which was written on the pepresentation of figut. Chariki he who
eays
that he has discovered distinct evidence that
Chang Yoh with one of the piratical crafts was in Hongkong and the Viceroy states that he has bautraced by the help of informers to Hongkong. Whilst Chang Ych in his evidace in the
first case scrid he was
said he was arrested
because he refused to give evidence against Chang Ohi. This, of co by U Sui Han.
course, is denied.
Inspector Matheson
ear
that he
he knows the jewk; it looks like a jeuk, hasuo traces of quees but traces of having carried salt, and as to the accused being traced by informen,
we have
it in evidence that he came daily to the
charge room; after Chang thi had
into the Gaol.
lecen arrested,
arrested, went into
came up to Court daily;
The Viceroy
aud
also mentions Chang
Sai Fang you to, Pang Hang, Cheang Chang
Fun, A-man, Izai tren and shaikan, as being the other pirates
and being
being in hiding in Hongkong. The
the
reaueu
I believe, are on board the salt
defence
the
in
who
ever
I jrunk and who the
wanted to call as withieudes
e first case, but they got frightened
As soon as
Chang Chi
was arstið;
aud it is to them that Mr Mackean
alludes
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.